INTRODUCTION
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is an extension of Portfolio Theory, which is concerned with the risk and return of portfolios and the process by which risk can be reduced by efficient diversification. The CAPM assumes that all investors are efficiently diversified and examines the risk and return of any capital asset. A capital asset can be a portfolio, an individual share or security, a portfolio of projects or investments made by a company or even an individual project.
The CAPM gives the required rate of return on a capital asset, based on its contribution to total portfolio risk, called systematic risk. It gives a very neat way of calculating riskadjusted discount rates.
SYSTEMATIC AND UNSYSTEMATIC RISK
When securities are combined in a portfolio part of each security‟s total risk (its standard deviation) is eliminated. This is the basis of diversification. That part of an individual security‟s total risk which can be eliminated by combining that security with an efficient portfolio is called unsystematic (or specific) risk. The balance of an individual security‟s total risk (that part which cannot be eliminated by diversification) is called systematic (or market) risk.
- Unsystematic Risk – risk which can be eliminated by diversification. It is the variation in a company‟s returns due to specific factors affecting that company and not the market as a whole, e.g. strikes, the breakdown of machinery, changes in fashion for that company‟s products etc. This specific risk is a random fluctuation uncorrelated with the returns on the market portfolio (the market as a whole). Therefore, when a large number of shares are held these random fluctuations tend to cancel out – i.e. there is risk reduction.
- Systematic Risk – risk which cannot be eliminated by diversification. This is the fluctuation in returns due to general factors in the market affecting all companies e.g. inflation, government policy, economic conditions etc. It is that part of the fluctuations in returns which is correlated with those of the market portfolio.
When a capital asset (S) is combined with no other assets, the risk of the portfolio is simply the standard deviation of (S). When further assets are added, however, the contribution of (S) to the portfolio risk is quickly reduced – diversification is eliminating the unsystematic risk. It takes a surprisingly low number of shares in a portfolio to eliminate the majority of unsystematic risk (twenty shares in a portfolio will eliminate approximately 94% of unsystematic risk). All unsystematic risk could only be eliminated when the market portfolio is held.
Only systematic risk is relevant in calculating the required return on capital assets. This is because, on the assumption that investors hold efficient portfolios, unsystematic risk is automatically eliminated when another asset is incorporated within that portfolio. The only effect an asset has on portfolio risk is through its systematic risk.
The CAPM provides a useful technique for calculating costs of capital and discount rates appropriate to capital projects based on their individual levels of risk. However, there are two drawbacks to the practical application of the CAPM. Firstly, the data necessary to calculate
Beta factors and the difficulty in obtaining them. Secondly, the assumptions on which the model is based, which question the validity of the model itself. Among these assumptions are:
- Investors are rational and risk-averse – without this the whole idea of diversification becomes meaningless.
- There are no transaction costs – this is not true in practice (broker‟s fees, etc.) It effectively makes the attainment of the market portfolio impossible. However, by holding only a limited number of well selected shares it should be possible to obtain a fairly close approximation to the market portfolio.
- All investors are efficiently diversified – the CAPM is based on the assumption that all investors have eliminated unsystematic risk by diversification and hence only systematic risk (measured by Beta) is relevant in determining returns.
In conclusion, although the CAPM can be criticised it is nevertheless a very useful model in dealing with the problem of risk.
